Rock Worship Forums

Discuss Gear, Production, Philosophy and Theology of Music, Songwriting, etc...

You are not logged in.

#1 2008-02-06 09:36:10

Travis
Founder
From: Fort Collins, CO
Registered: 2005-12-21
Posts: 68
Website

Compression?!

Ok, I'll get us all started here.  Lets talk about compressors.  I know people that really don't like to use much compression on the various elements of their mix, and some that take the opposite approach and squeeze the heck out of everything.

So, what trains of thought are out there on compression?  What ratios do you like to use on vocals?  Kick drum?  Snare?  Bass guitar?  Ever compress subgroups?  How do you go about using the attack and release settings?  Threshold?  Knee?  Do you hate compression altogether?  Do you love it?  Have at it!


______________________________________
". . . I will sing and make music to the LORD."
Psalm 27:6b

Offline

 

#2 2008-02-15 10:25:16

zac.oler
New member
Registered: 2008-02-15
Posts: 3

Re: Compression?!

Compression is necessary to a full and well rounded mix. Period.  First things first, You have got to compress your vocals.  At CF's Alive we have cheap little Tapco Squeez 2 channel compressors but they are excellent at taking the peak out of vocals and making the vocals blend better.  Now, if you have more compressors got to the acoustic guitar next.  It takes the *ick* out of piezo-electric pickups.  It makes the hole thing sound way more full.  Now, to the tricky part, Drums.  A little compression on the kick can make your kick have a lot more boom.  However, it is not really a necessary.  The snare is not something I compress very often UNLESS you have two snare mics.  I like my snare to pop out of the mix.  The rest of the drums you can throw small amounts of compression just to take the attack off of them.

Sidenote:  At Alive we have MACKIE ONYX 24-4 and we have been running all of the drums except the snare through the subgroup 1and2 and then compressing it with the onboard compression and actually it sounds way better.  For our setup it takes the attack of all the drums except the snare making it less distracting.  Now I know this solution is not for everyone (especially those with crappy onboard compression) but for us it is slick trick that is quite effective.

Offline

 

#3 2008-02-15 11:42:14

Doug Smith
New member
Registered: 2008-02-15
Posts: 7

Re: Compression?!

I think vocal compession is a must.  Then I'd say bass is next, followed by a tie between snare and heavy stummed acoustic guitar.  Only gates on the kick and toms.

The reason I didn't put snare above acoustic guitars is that typically you get a lot of stage bleed from the snare in small/medium venues, so it's not coming 100% coming through the PA like the acoustics are, where the compression can be more useful.

I like the drum pieces uncompressed and dynamic.

No compression on the PA.

Inserting compression on a subgroup is a good idea if you're short on compressors, expecially for large number of vocalists that you mix as one.  I'd still keep an individual compressor on the lead vocalist and keep them out of that subgroup so his volume doesn't trigger the compressor.

Generally the Auto attack and release are great and are better than the soundman's decisions.  Sometimes for bass and snare I like manual attack and release to slow down the attack so the initial signal is uneffected.  This lets some pop or slap through and then compresses the tail of the signal.

Doug

Offline

 

#4 2008-02-15 21:14:55

Disciple
New member
From: Burnsville, Minnesota
Registered: 2008-02-15
Posts: 5
Website

Re: Compression?!

I would like to address the topic of ratios, since it was brought up.  A typical vocal compression ratio is about 3:1, and as a rule can be a good starting point for other instruments as well, but depending on what you're working with, may change.  We often have a violin and cello on our worship team and I've found that, especially for the violin, 3:1 just doesn't cut it.  A violin can be such a dynamic instrument that I've had to roll our ratio closer to 5:1 and lower the threshold quite a bit.  If I don't, you either don't hear the violin amongst the rest of the band when it's being played softly, or it's taking heads off in the first three rows when she starts digging into it.

Keeping the ratio high and the threshold low allows me to boost the gain slightly and level the whole thing out so that there's still some presence in the mix when the violin is being played softly, but it's not painful when it's played hard.  The whole goal with compression is to still keep the music dynamic and well, musical, without having the blasting peaks which tend to distract the audience.

We're basically running a little bit of compression most of the time, same thing with the snare and cello. Our system is set up for this though.  I tend to run the vocal compressors with the threshold set right on the edge for the same reasons, added presence at lower volumes, and controlled yet dynamic peaks. 

My approach to compression and ratios is quite different for live vs. a recording.  I personally believe there is too much compression on most modern albums, robbing the music of some of it's soul, but for live, run with it!  There's a bit more room for error, most of it's on the fly, and your goals are quite different.  Hope this helps.

Ian - Rock Minneapolis


“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." - Edward Abbey

Offline

 

#5 2008-02-19 07:56:47

Travis
Founder
From: Fort Collins, CO
Registered: 2005-12-21
Posts: 68
Website

Re: Compression?!

Speaking of violin and cello . . .

I've added these two instruments on a regular basis in our Sunday morning worship teams. 

Both instruments are nice and warm sounding in their natural form, and I've taken to miking them with Shure WL184 mics, clipped to the bridge (with a little foam padding between the clip and the bridge, which eliminated a nasty buzz). 

Got any mic, eq and/or effects tips for these?  They have a tendency to sound harsh and a little hollow.  I'm going to run up the compression a bit next time and see what that does.


______________________________________
". . . I will sing and make music to the LORD."
Psalm 27:6b

Offline

 

#6 2008-02-20 10:11:30

Doug Smith
New member
Registered: 2008-02-15
Posts: 7

Re: Compression?!

Our church purchased fishman transducers for the cello & violin - non-invasive units that fit in a slot in the bridge and have a 1/4" jack that gets temporarilly mounted..  These passive units run through a high impedence active DI to the board.

As with all transducers, they can be shrill/harsh in the 1-4 kHz range and sound more natural with some EQ there, and maybe some lower mids taken out too.  Compression is a must because it seems as the higher the notes they play, the louder their output is (or they play harder), so a compresser helps even that out.

Speaking of mics, we've tried SM57's and SM81's with strings but never a lapel mic like you are doing.  Mics work as long as they aren't surrounded by high stage volume and can live with less monitor, which is pretty much the opposite of our situation.  The Fishman transducers are great because we've never had feedback from these instruments.

Reverb (like a Hall effect) is nice on strings.

Offline

 

#7 2008-03-18 19:59:24

Cory Ridenhower
New member
Registered: 2008-02-25
Posts: 7

Re: Compression?!

from what ive read so far, its pretty much a must to have some compression. ive never even heard of it until not long ago. we dont use it but if it would help i am interested in looking into it. how would i begin looking into the right thing for what im working with?

Offline

 

#8 2008-03-19 13:39:00

Travis
Founder
From: Fort Collins, CO
Registered: 2005-12-21
Posts: 68
Website

Re: Compression?!

Yeah, compression is definitely a must.  It's also a bit of an art form, although there are general guidelines to using it.  Basically, it's a dynamic squisher - compression lowers the loud peaks in volume on a particular channel, so you can turn the entire channel up without peaking if someone on stage yells, or hits a really loud note or something.  The trick is to reduce the dynamic range enough that you can turn the overall track up and get more volume, but not so much that it sounds "squished" or starts pulsing. 

I've worked with three compressors (and a bunch of protools plug-in compressors, which basically do the same thing, but in the recording world) - Behringer, Sampson, and PreSonus.  I really like the PreSonus 8 channel that we use on Sundays, and the portable system seems to get decent results out of the Sampson Com4.  Do NOT purchase Behringer compressors, they've given us nothing but trouble.  Come to think of it, don't purchase Behringer anything . . .


______________________________________
". . . I will sing and make music to the LORD."
Psalm 27:6b

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson